(sorry, I don't know how to attach/insert images in this system, have to just link it). That's such a simpleton's measure of quality IMO, and it is also out of touch.Īnyone who thinks that this quality "sux" should just go back to 2d platform games. It's like saying "This game complete sux because instead of an A+ for one out of at least 10 variables to consider (graphics), it gets an A." In no way does FC3 look poor or even mediocre. There's a difference between a game looking great, mediocre, or poor. To ignore them is to take a simplistic, subjective approach to the evaluation. Why judge a game solely on what it looks like compared to another game? There are numerous other factors to consider. I love this game (and the Crysis franchise). Originally posted by Aionion:meh, game looks and plays on ultra just fine for me.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |